Designing for Community: Make Participant Experience Visible

Part IV

Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz
Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz

Design activities in which we meet kindred spirits, discover each other’s gifts, and learn as much as possible about what works.

I was so aware of the invisibility of the talent and experience in the room at several conferences that I’ve attended of late!  Make use of those with stories to tell.   The potential for cross-fertilization of ideas and practices is magnified when designs bring forth the richness of experience present in a group.  And assume these gems will sparkle even brighter when lit by ideas contributed by luminaries.

Benefits of inviting participants to share their experiences: it sparks ideas, encourages new connections, and identifies possible partners. It also informs new theory to be articulated out of practice.

Design Suggestions

The simplest means I know to optimize sharing is to use Open Space Technology, inviting people to self-organize around what matters to them. When the topic is abstract, like the “future of journalism” or “connecting for community” and the group isn’t a formal organization, I’ve found a few activities can provide some useful context about who’s coming and the gifts they bring before opening the space.

Sending a briefing book with bios before a gathering gives people a sense of who’s coming.  With online registration tools, it’s easy to ask registrants for a bio or to answer questions about why they’re coming or gifts that they’re bringing.  The briefing book makes great travel reading.

An effective activity I’ll do early in a gathering is a “trade fair”, in which people are invited to host a table to share their work.  It’s a fast way to discover something about what’s happening in the field. I usually set the stage in advance, asking during registration if they want to host a table.  They can bring materials, paper or electronic, to dress their space. I find this minimal structure supports self-organizing that makes visible the experiences in the room.  Participants get to see a range of examples in a fun, informal and intimate format.

Such activities help participants find connections and partners.  It can be inspiring to see what others have accomplished and can spark ideas to apply to their own work. This sort of informal sharing encourages a culture of mutual support, in which we can all benefit.

No matter what your design, it is always wise to expect the unexpected.  That is the topic of the last post of the series.

Share

Designing for Community: Include Theory and Practice in Conference Designs

Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz
Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz

Part III

Theory and practice amplify each other’s value

Ideas stimulate new thinking.  They interrupt habitual assumptions.  Examples ground us in real life.  They give ideas form.  If we focus just on ideas, we run the risk of getting lost in abstractions.  If we just look at practical examples, we could miss seeing larger patterns that encourage innovation and the adoption of great work.

As someone who thrives on the abstract, I’ve come to appreciate that stories of what’s working bring ideas to life.  Through stories, practice informs theory.

Often, the role of luminaries is to bring new thinking — theory — to gatherings.  A few ideas can go a long ways towards influencing the work of the people attending.  Theories provide frameworks and language that can make successful practices easier to grasp.

What is less often present in gatherings is the opportunity to learn about the good work attendees are doing.  Great designs for gatherings make the most out of the gifts brought by everyone who comes.  Every group contains a range of experiences.  Some are newcomers seeking to learn about what already exists.  Others are veterans, with a myriad of stories that illuminate years of learning.  Some are theorists, pattern seekers wanting to make visible essentials of what works.  And there are pragmatists, who don’t care why something works.  They’re just focused on making good things happen. While there’s often a tension between theorists and practitioners, I find that each is enriched by the presence of the other.

Design Suggestion

Include a variety of activities.  Spend some time introducing new ideas.  Spend some time showing off work done by people who are present.  And use the majority of the time for people to interact.

If having luminaries engage with the whole group is a useful way to introduce new ideas and theories, inviting people in the room to share their work is a great way to learn through successful examples. Interactions are the glue, helping us to clarify our thoughts, connect with others, and more deeply integrate the experience.

Part II dealt with good ways to engage luminaries with the group to bring the spice of new ideas.  Open Space is a clear winner for maximizing group interactions.  Ah, but that middle activity…when you’ve got dozens of examples of great work and not necessarily skilled storytellers, what designs optimize the sharing? Next week’s post is devoted to that subject…

 

Share

Designing for Community: Create a Tapestry of Ideas

Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz
Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz

Part II

Invite thought leaders with different world views so that participants benefit from a diversity of perspectives

With a center of gravity in Open Space Technology – a process that supports self-organization, it took me years of experimenting to conclude that in some circumstances a few well chosen thought leaders can add value by speaking at a gathering.  Among their benefits: they can help to frame an ambiguous question so that participants have some common reference points. They can stimulate new thinking.  And they can provide shared language around complex topics.

Too often, all, or most, of the luminaries invited to speak are older white men.  Particularly when the participation is diverse, this choice makes less and less sense.  I have been far too guilty of this in events that I’ve run!  When I recently experienced it from the other side, I noticed how much I checked out as I got more and more impatient with a homogenous world view (e.g., male, Christian-Judeo, of a similar age and largely shaped by similar world events).  Even when the topics themselves varied, the speakers began to sound alike to me. The sad part was that every one of the people chosen was wise, caring, and definitely worth hearing!  And yet I was aware of the common cultural assumptions among them all.  I longed for voices, wise voices, of people who had a different life experience.  I wanted a tapestry of perspectives that included people whose world view was radically different from my own.

Design Suggestion

When responsible for a conference design, encourage the hosting group to step back from their first thoughts of who gets to speak to the whole group and consider factors beyond the content they bring.  In addition to being thought-provoking, what’s the mix of ethnicity, gender, geography, generation, and roles among the few who are chosen?  Will participants see themselves in the mix?  Will they experience at least one view so completely different from their own that it disrupts their assumptions about how the world works?  Finding a mix that suits the purpose of coming together is an art worth cultivating.

And then there’s the coaching of the speakers, or conversation catalysts, as I’ve come to think of them.  Some have a natural gift for showing up in a co-creative partnership. Others, often among those who have been speaking for years, do it well, and yet in an environment where engagement is key, they can come across as bringing knowledge from “on high”.  I find that the more a luminary brings not just their wisdom but also their curiosity, the more alive their contribution becomes. Being curious seems to bring with it a humility that changes their relationship with a group in profoundly authentic ways.

One last point: keep it brief!  Very few people have the gift to hold attention for more than 20 minutes at a stretch.  And even those who do have a chance for a different experience when invited to assume they’ll be interacting with participants.

Since Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity came out in 2010, I have had more opportunity to experience life on the other side of the podium. As someone who has built a practice around creating welcoming conditions for others to speak, I was challenged by the expectation that I’d offer my ideas as well as engaging the people in the room.  Dissatisfied with what I was doing, my experiments got bolder.  Last year, I finally found a strategy that works for me.  And it now informs my coaching to others when they are invited to speak at conferences I host.

My breakthrough experience was a ninety minute session with a group of 200 business leaders at a management conference in Perth, Australia.  The chairs were set theatre style.  Within moments of being introduced, I invited people to take a few minutes to get out of their seats and talk to at least three people about something related to the topic (emergence in organizations) that made them curious.  I’d never done something like that at a scale of several hundred people before.  Within minutes, the room was abuzz.  And then I asked them to form clusters with others who seemed to be interested in similar questions.  When we harvested the questions, I got a taste of where to put the emphasis of my remarks. They were now actively listening through their own questions.  And they met some kindred spirits.

It worked.

Share

Designing for Community: Luminaries and Engagement

Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz
Image by David Kessler, www.davidkessler.biz

As someone who usually hosts events for others, I was delighted to be a participant in a recent gathering on community. What a lesson I got by being on the other side of the experience!

In addition to learning about how to be a good participant when the design is done by friends, I found myself reflecting on what contributes to gatherings that:

  1. Make the most of the knowledge and experience of the people in the room;
  2. Support participants to make great connections;
  3. Bring the wisdom of luminaries – respected, deep thinkers — on whatever subject drew people together; and
  4. Deepen collective understanding of a complex topic.

Like most gatherings that have moved past lecture and panel discussion formats, this event used a combination of thought provoking speakers and small group conversations to do its work.  The final day was in Open Space so that people could self-organize around topics of interest.

A common design challenge with such gatherings is to work the tension between hearing from luminaries and engaging participants. When the mix is off, it shows up in missed expectations and at its worst, a revolt by participants.  (It didn’t go that far at this gathering, though I’ve been on the receiving end of a revolt.  But that’s another story…)

I left this conference contemplating four design choices to support the four goals I mentioned above.  They are:

I’ll say a few words about each of these ideas over the next few weeks.  Now there’s a concept: a series of short posts, rather than one long one!

Stay tuned.

Share

An Interview Guide for Endings

Image by David Kesser, www.davidkessler.biz/art_gallery.htm

I just taught a course in the American University MSOD program called Implementing System Change.  It is the last course of a two-year program.  On the last day, I wanted to give the students some time to dive deeply into a reflection about their experience of the whole program.

My friend and colleague, Sue Woehrlin, who teaches at Antioch University Seattle, suggested using the Hero’s Journey as a framework. What a terrific idea!  I drafted questions using an adaptation of Joseph Campbell’s stages of the journey.

The interview guide got it’s inaugural run this weekend.  The students loved it!  And the quality of the group discussion told me that they had gone deep with each other.  I think it did its work to 1) help them prepare for their comp exam; and 2) support them in integrating their experience.

The guide is intended to be used in trios, with an interviewer, interviewee, and a note taker.  I had envisioned 1.5 hours — 30 minutes a person.  We ended up with about 20 minutes a person, which was a little skinny.

Rather than giving them the discussion guide — also in the attachment — to use in groups of 6, we moved from trios to the whole group.  So I used the discussion guide to shape prompting questions for the whole group discussion.

I’m sharing the interview guide because it could be adapted for the closure of any immersion experience.  Enjoy!

Share

The Future of Western Civilization

Now isn’t the future of our civilization a big topic!  I did an interview on February 29th with Nicholas Beecroft.  He’s been pursuing this subject by talking to a variety of people.

The questions Nicholas asked were so big that I found myself looking for simple, practical answers.

Check out my responses to:

  • How can we boost our cultural direction and self-confidence?
  • What’s your highest vision for Western Civilisation?
  • What’s the new, emerging civilisation?
  • Whats great about the current Western Civilisation which we should preserve and cherish?
  • How can we ignite a self-propagating group process to transform Western Civilisation for the better?
  • How can we evolve democracy to be deeper and more effective?
  • How can we integrate the dark, shadow side of our history so as to unlock our power and potential? Do we or anyone need to have a strategy in the traditional sense?
  • How do we best support collective intelligence, group change processes and emergence to get the best outcome?
  • How can we reorganise our large government bureaucracies for health, education, welfare etc to fully liberate the human spirit of the staff and community and to embed a learning, evolutionary system to harness global intelligence?
  • How do we create new fields of consciousness – our energetic potential into which the future will emerge- create the field of alignment and remove the obstacles and provide the support structures and allow the self-organisation to occur?

If you prefer, here’s an MP3 for download

To see a list of Nicholas’ other interviews, take a look:

Share

On Gratitude: With a nod to Harrison Owen, Anne Stadler, and Spirited Work

When I ran a session last year at the International Conference on Complex Systems, I was struck by a practice followed by most of the presenters.  They acknowledged the people who had influenced their work.

I’m just finishing a wonderful book that I got at the conference: Complexity: A Guided Tour by Melanie Mitchell.  It’s a terrific overview, looking across multiple disciplines – computation, evolution, genetics, networks and more. Like the conference presenters, Mitchell included photos of thought leaders as she introduced their ideas.

I am inspired by this custom of honoring those who influence you!

So as I return to my blog after a crazy, wonderful, hectic year of sharing the ideas from the award-winning Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity, I thought I’d begin with a thanks to those who have most influenced my work:

 

 

 

 

Spirited Work was an Open Space learning community of practice that met quarterly from 1998 to 2004 to explore the intersection of being and doing – spirit and work.  Anne Stadler cooked up the idea of Spirited Work.  It became our playground for learning about emergence in human systems, among many lessons.  It continues to inform our work and our friendship years later.

The form at the heart Spirited Work – Open Space Technology – was created by Harrison Owen.  Harrison introduced me to Anne – one of the many gifts for which I am grateful.  Beyond the intro to Anne and Open Space Technology, Harrison’s friendship has brought with it his lifetime of learning about chaos and order.  My first taste came during an Open Space Technology workshop that I did with Harrison in 1999. As participants were off in breakout sessions, Harrison told me of his Ph.D. research into chaos and order.  He spoke of the contradictory images of an immanent and a transcendent G-d in the Old Testament.  I remember the question said he was researching: if the best and the brightest of the time created this holy book, what was their purpose in introducing so much contradiction?

His stories about pursing that question, not to mention the power of the question itself, influenced me more than I can put into words.  Through the years of making sense of why Open Space works, that use of the language of spirit coupled with an explanation based in complexity science helped me to recognize that these were simply two ways of pointing into the same territory.

When I talk about the gifts I’ve received from knowing Harrison and from Open Space, I often share some lessons that I took away early on:

  • Generosity of spirit.  Harrison opted not to copyright or trademark the process.  Instead, he made it clear that Open Space is free for the taking. The only responsibility is to give back, to share what you learn.
  • Focus on essence. While it is easy to get wrapped up in the complexity of any situation, Harrison has a talent for attending to what matters most. All the rest is details.
  • Simplicity of design.  I’ve called Harrison a master of laziness, always finding the path of the least effort for the greatest outcome. I love the power of a question he always poses: What’s one less thing to do?  To which I add: and still be whole and complete?
  • Inclusion/invitation. The stories Harrison tells of welcoming the stranger makes it exquisitely clear that both the stranger within and from outside bring gifts, no matter how they how they show up.

So I open this year on my blog with gratitude to Spirited Work, Anne Stadler, and Harrison Owen!

Share

Liz Rykert Reflects on Engaging Emergence

Liz Rykert, President of Meta Strategies, interviewed me on a “Plexus Call” — an unrehearsed, spontaneous conversation among leading complexity scholars and practitioners — for the Plexus Institute.  Liz shared her notes with me and I share them with you!

My Preparation for the Interview with Peggy Holman and her new  book Engaging Emergence for the Plexus Institue’s Plexus Call on February 11th, 2011.

As I read the book I felt a sense of circling back and opening up and circling back and opening up. I found myself drawing a visual guide to map out the ideas in the book, helping me to both attend to the sections and the whole at the same time. For me this is not unlike what you need to think about when engaging emergence itself. Of particular note I appreciated the section devoted to the “catches” one encounters while engaging emergence. These rang true for me especially in my positive deviance work. As I went through the book I noted the sequence of questions she shared and extracted those for myself to use them as a stand alone guide to assist in the work. I include them below along with my doodles.

The conversation with Peggy was a delight, full of insight and discovery.

Liz Rykert – Feb 14/11

The Sequence of Questions in Engaging Emergence

  • How can we use our differences and commonalities to make a difference?
  • What is the difference that makes a difference?
  • How do we more fully understand each other and our environment?
  • How do we link ourselves and our ideas with others similar and different than ourselves?
  • What does it take to be receptive to the unknown?
  • Call forth what could be: What do we want more of?
  • What is working?
  • What is possible?
  • How do we create it?
  • What guides us when we don’t know?
  • What purpose moves us?
  • How do we cultivate conditions for the best possible outcomes?
  • How do we include the true diversity of the situation?
  • How do we engage so we achieve the best possible outcomes?
  • How do we inspire explorations that lead to positive actions?
  • What could we do together that none of us could do alone?
  • What would it look like if we were working?
  • What could this team also be?
  • How do we release assumptions of how things are to make space for new possibilities?
  • What is arising now?
  • What themes are surfacing that excite us?
  • What can we name now that wasn’t possible before?
  • How do we call forth what is ripening?
  • Once meaning is named how is it spread?
  • What keeps us going?
  • How do we find potential in the midst of disruption?
  • How do we create conditions in which chance interactions among diverse members of a system lead to break throughs?
  • How do we surface what matters to the individuals and to the whole?
  • How do we make space for the whole story – god, bad, or indifferent?
  • What is the least we need to do to create the most benefit?
  • What is our purpose in seeking change?
  • What is one less thing to do and still be whole and complete?
  • How do we disrupt coherence compassionately?
  • How do we engage disruptions creatively?
  • How do we renew coherence wisely?
  • How do we find potential in the midst of disruption?
Share

Journalism that Matters video makes the home page of the Knight Foundation

Beyond Bookstook place at MIT in Cambridge, Mass. on April 6 and 7, 2011.  The organizing question:

What’s possible when journalists and librarians come together?

We brought together about 130 participants to explore this question.  Filmaker, Jacob Caggiano, created a fabulous 7 minute video that tells the story.  And it was so good, that the Knight Foundation put it on their homepage!

Check it out:

Beyond Books – What’s possible when librarians and journalists meet? from Jacob Caggiano on Vimeo.

Share